Airlines tire of tight security

Airlines tire of tight security

Passengers aren't the only ones getting annoyed with the strict, time-consuming security checks at American airports. Carriers, airlines and government bodies have weighed in with their own concerns that the measures are expensive in both time and money, without a proportional increase in safety.

These measures include having to remove shoes to be scanned, throwing away all bottles more than 100mls in volume, and walking through a revealing full body scanner.

Europe starts swinging

Michael Broughton, chairman of British Airways, told press at the UK Airport Operators annual conference that parts of America’s program were “completely redundant and they should be sorted out”.

The Financial Times reports a large number of airlines have echoed Broughton's sentiments. These include Germany's Lufthansa, Iberia of Spain, Ireland's national carrier Ryanair and UK-based EasyJet. BAA, the UK’s largest owner of airports, has also backed the chairman’s point of view.

Even the European Union has voiced its opinions on the matter, and it’s not taking the side of the stars and stripes. Spokesman Michele Cercone told the New York Times that the measures represent “a burden for European citizens”.

Anger has also been heard from individual airline staff. As readers might remember, Express Jet pilot Michael Roberts gained international attention when he refused to undergo a body scan or receive a pat-down earlier this month. Roberts was stood down by his employer and hasn't flown an aircraft since. He's currently suing the US government for breaches of his constitutional rights.

Despite the controversy, the Australian government is pushing ahead with plans to install the scanners as a part of its own significant upgrades.  

The rise of air travel limits

Measures have been strict in the States since 9/11, and have only become more intricate since. The failed "shoe-bomber" attack of December 2001 created the requirement for passengers to have their shoes scanned for explosives while they walk in socks or bare feet through security.  

More recently another unsuccesful attempt from an "underwear-bomber" in December 2009 has led to the widespread use of the notorious full-body scanners.  

While terrorism remains a real threat, growing dissatisfaction and increased calls for measures to be reviewed could lead to major changes happening soon. On the other hand, another terrorist attack occurring on an airline could make things even worse.

In the meantime, those who buy the 11-inch Macbook Air have a small bonus. Like iPads, they're small enough to go through security without the usual checks required by notebooks.

[Financial Times]

 

1 Comment

  • AusraliaHouses

    AusraliaHouses

    5 Jun, 2012 02:41 pm

    AUSTRALIA TO ROLL OUT INEFFICIENT AND DANGEROUS BODY SCANNERS THAT GERMANY HAS REJECTED. FOR MORE AND WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT, COPY/PASTE: change.org/petitions/anthonyalbanese

    No member give thanks

Guest

11 Dec, 2016 10:50 pm

×
×

Forgot Password

If you’ve forgotten your password, simply enter your email address below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email to re-activate your account and enter a new password.

×